In the consequence up to the outbreak of civil war in England, at that place were several reasons as to why the Royalist Cause and Charles were defeated. numerous of his subjects came to question whether he was a monarch who could be bank to rule within the ambiguous bounds of the unwritten antediluvian patriarch constitution.
Firstly, Charles alone contributed heavily to the defeat of the Royalist cause. He was hampered by a speech defect which made communication severe and communication with Parliament suffered as a direct result. many another(prenominal) ideas and thoughts needed interpretation because of this. He had a shy temper which as a draw wasnt a satisfactory attribute to attain. Some people argue that he was nerveless in that he couldnt understand criticism or any ideas that didnt match his own. Once he had an idea, to him that was final exam and the only right idea. Charles as a military leader overly added to the defeat.
He made himself commander in antique and while this may pretend strengthened his position if he could provide strong leadership and bring his generals and politicians together, it also meant that he became responsible for his defeat. Good advice was never acted upon.
Military failure also played a role in the defeat of the Royalist cause. Charles failed to take advantage of the strengths of his position. After the stale mate at Edgehill, Charles had the opportunity to proceed to London but after faint progress he had to turn back to Turnham Green. Progressing to London would have allowed Charles l greater opportunities. It houses many of the greatest ports and had great advantages for whoever had crusade of it.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
0 comments:
Post a Comment